Dear EU follower,

Below you will find the latest intelligence report concerning the key votes in the latest plenary session of the European Parliament, which took place during the period 2025-05-05 to 2025-05-08.

In total, we have analysed 275 votes cast on content within 37 reports, and which addressed a total of 71 different topics / policy angles.

The number of roll-call votes is a strong indicator of the areas where there is strong political and policy competition.

We provide an overview of the directions in which the political groups and individual MEPs manifested interest in shaping the policy when voting on each item.

Analytical method: for each topic we display the two "policy dilemmas or choices" and we highlight which is the policy direction validated by each group and MEP with their votes. If you have your own suggestions of additional angles of analysis, feel free to reach out to us.

To find other similar analysis for other policy areas click here.

Additional (premium) resources that EU Matrix provides:

1) To access our free-of-charge vote-by-vote detailed analysis for each report, contact us at [email protected].

2) On our www.eumatrix.eu platform you are able to find the full historic database of MEPs', Governments' and Commissioners' statements and actions (e.g. votes, amendments, meetings) in searchable and exportable format, as well as analysed policy documents, in-depth analysis of the socio-political trends across the EU and much more (*accessible with a premium account - contact us at [email protected]).

Report: The European Water Resilience Strategy

Topic: Agriculture (green) Greening of agriculture

Policy choices: Prioritise environment/Prioritise farmers' competitiveness

Direction: Prioritise farmers' competitiveness

There were 3 votes on proposals for adjusting the text of the document in the direction of Prioritise farmers' competitiveness. Out of these 0 received majoritarian political support to be adopted.

Who authored these requests for adjustments: MEPs (3)

How did the political groups pull their weight when voting (across the totality of items that fulfil the criteria above):

EPP: 89 For (18.2%), 392 Against (80.0%), 9 Abstain (1.8%)

S&D: 1 For (0.3%), 354 Against (99.7%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

PfE: 249 For (100.0%), 0 Against (0.0%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

ECR: 220 For (99.1%), 1 Against (0.5%), 1 Abstain (0.5%)

Renew: 14 For (6.8%), 191 Against (93.2%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

Greens/EFA: 0 For (0.0%), 147 Against (100.0%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

The Left: 6 For (5.2%), 99 Against (85.3%), 11 Abstain (9.5%)

ESN: 64 For (97.0%), 1 Against (1.5%), 1 Abstain (1.5%)

NI: 36 For (57.1%), 6 Against (9.5%), 21 Abstain (33.3%)

Number of MEPs with individual positions (non-aligned to group) at least once:

EPP – 48, S&D – 1, PfE – 0, ECR – 2, Renew – 5, Greens/EFA – 0, The Left – 8, ESN – 2

We provide in-depth vote-by-vote analysis in our detailed (premium) report.

Direction: Prioritise environment

There were 1 votes on proposals for adjusting the text of the document in the direction of Prioritise environment. Out of these 1 received majoritarian political support to be adopted.

Who authored these requests for adjustments: original text

How did the political groups pull their weight when voting (across the totality of items that fulfil the criteria above):

EPP: 155 For (93.9%), 3 Against (1.8%), 7 Abstain (4.2%)

S&D: 116 For (100.0%), 0 Against (0.0%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

PfE: 1 For (1.2%), 81 Against (97.6%), 1 Abstain (1.2%)

ECR: 1 For (1.3%), 74 Against (98.7%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

Renew: 62 For (92.5%), 5 Against (7.5%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

Greens/EFA: 48 For (100.0%), 0 Against (0.0%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

The Left: 40 For (100.0%), 0 Against (0.0%), 0 Abstain (0.0%)

ESN: 2 For (9.1%), 19 Against (86.4%), 1 Abstain (4.5%)

NI: 8 For (34.8%), 8 Against (34.8%), 7 Abstain (30.4%)

Number of MEPs with individual positions (non-aligned to group) at least once:

EPP – 10, S&D – 0, PfE – 2, ECR – 1, Renew – 5, Greens/EFA – 0, The Left – 0, ESN – 3

We provide in-depth vote-by-vote analysis in our detailed (premium) report.